This article is wonderful however I do not see where a lot of it applies to me personally and my lifestyle choices.
Do not get me wrong in many, many ways it does apply but the articles focus is on the submissive male which consider a different animal than the submissive female entirely.
My personal belief is that when a woman is a lifestyle submissive she is assuming her natural role and keep in mind you can be a submissive woman without being a masochist, I just happen to be a masochist as well.
The natural and biblical “place” for a woman is the nurturer, the submissive, chattel, property, mother, lover, slut what ever place her man, and in the case of this society, the man she chose, chooses to assign as her place.
Unlike a man when a woman reverts back to her natural role that is exactly what she is doing. Simply stepping into the shoes that fit and wearing them. Once they do this these fearless women are oftentimes, more than not much happier ladies.
Seriously just look at the world around us here in
Women’s rights led to welfare and the government not only as a nanny but a stand in husband. Children are raised with the values of a day care worker instead of their mother/father /families because being a stay at home mother is equated to laziness or a lack of ambition. Divorce is on the rise because it is the socially accepted norm instead of being frowned upon as it was. Churches are allowing women leaders, which is not biblical in any sense of the word but a devastating twist of the bible leading many to believe the way we believe Christianity now is in fact how it was. The white male has been displaced by sex and race and the black male has been farmed out into hopeless situations (projects) and expected to rise above an environment of hopelessness. We can blame the government BUT….”We the People……….
I blame this on submissive men. Men who allow women to have power because now in the luxury of a technological society, they can, with little or no concern about the future , just the immediate future of their dicks. The can sit back and be the bitch. Now with 79% of all college graduates being women, I wonder how these same men’s sons will fell being, essentially ruled by women, When it is more than a fetish or a lifestyle choice but a simple reality, an Amazonian society. When men are not the leaders but the drones and are not even needed for reproduction because scientifically we already though difficult can accomplish this feat.
What will happen is the destruction of life as we know it and a cataclysmic war because women should not be in charge of the button. Women are highly charged emotional beings, and that is a good thing when placed in the right hands, however the hands of women are not the right place. Even with this cataclysmic out look you can rest assured, should this happen, men will regain then their rightful place as leaders, protectors, and providers because women need those things that men offer and are simply living under the umbrella of what Men in history have given them.
So unlike women who just assume their natural role men assume an unnatural rule when submitting. The two can never be equated just as men and women will never be equal. If you disagree just take a look in you panties and tell me you have the same thing.
11 comments on Anti-feminist Rantings
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster
I have said for years that Women rule the earth and it will only get worse.......because, at the very least, 50% of the men today should be considered women/submissive and are truly not male like at all....So even if the true gender split is 50/50, which it aint, u still see the women win......by a LARGE number.
What else could explain the rules of divorce???????????????
Brothers unite...yeah right!
Nice post...great ass
Second, I also expected you to get bashed for this article. Though, I once heard of a popular UF professor who made an argument every semester along a similar line. He said that before womens rights the most intelligent women in america only became teachers, which made for smart women. So now that all the smart women are going into business our children are becoming dumber.
I agree in part with his theory and yours, but I think we are just witnessing evolution. With every generation the y chromosone that makes men...men is getting shorter, eventually it will dissapear. And unlike women, men are incapable of reparing genetic diseases, so we will also become increasingly sicker over generations.
Genetically women are actually superior, and in a couple hundred thousand years will be all that exists, assuming humanity still exists then.
I seriously disagree with you there, About the Y chromosome. Since reading your comment I have found this to be a very faulty theory mostly spread by sources who wish it to be true as opposed to fact.
Firstly it has not gotten shorter every generation it has taken millions of years which is far longer that every generation and should they ever disappear as you think it may it will simply be replaced with another chromosome to determine sex.
The y has the unique ability to do gene conversion to protect itself and the X chromosome is susceptible to genetic diseases without being able to cure them, more actually due to having more genes and proteins.
I sometimes think people simply get caught up in hype. And for feminist what better hype could their be, that men victims of devolution.
I do not believe women are superior and defiantly believe we need a mans stabilizing power.
What do you make of the fact robotics are pushing men out of their typical place in the economy. What exactly are men going to do in the future that could be considered manly?
Many people mistake this flexibility and adaptability as meaning that women are "better than men" or can be independent. Which they can... I know I can... but it's not IDEAL. It's not the happiest position for most women. It's an ADAPTATION, often out of necessity.
The other thing, kind of a SECRET to me of being submissive (which I'm unfortunately lousy at... and I definitely have a very manly, alpha male husband![LOL]) is that in part, it's a game.
Men and women are flattered in different ways. Women generally, I think, have more secure egoes than men. It's not that women are submissive because they are stupid or less worthy or valuable. It's just that it makes men feel more manly, and in turn, more manly men are going to take better care of you and love you more.
When you talk about women being "property" of men I draw the line, because a, if you actually read the Bible carefully it may SAY that, but if you look at the RELATIONSHIPS between many Biblical couples, you will not find that to be reflected in their actions and words. Look at Sarah. Definitely had a lot to say to Abraham. Look at Miriam and Hannah and Rebeccah, Leah and Rachel. Or Jezebel, Mother Mary and Mary Madgalene... all very strong women who put up with adversities and when necessary, stood up to their husbands, even if in a gentle way. I think you are caricaturing the whole idea of the "Biblical Woman" as some type of perverted archetype based on your own personal desire to be an extreme submissive/masochist. Which is fine if you enjoy it, but that doesn't mean that it's reflective of the Bible's reality. Just fundamentalist people's interpretations of it. Even in cultures where women cover their heads and act submissive in public with their men, you can bet that when they go home and let their hair down, they are completely different.
It's not that men are necessarily wiser than women. It's just that it is a lot easier to let men be in charge. Even if they screw up, they are happier to be accountable, than to have to blame a woman for the error. And when they are really going to screw up, well, then it's time to bake some cookies and give a good blow job before you put your foot down!... [LOL] Men, I have found, can be idiots sometimes and cling to their dumb ideas... but even when they are being idiots, their saving grace is that they love women (ie you) so just make yourself lovable and exciting, and they will treat you with respect and listen to your ideas. Forcing them to listen, won't work.
The idea of being someone's "property", like I'm their pocket calculator and have no personal exchange in the relationship, does not appeal to me or seem realistic. Men are just as much "owned" by women: we extract their income, genetic material, social status, and emotional support. It's a 2 way street.
Sarah